COURT CASE FOR ARNA
Magistrate rules that Arna was not distressed and that the circus
did not cause cruelty by taking the elephants away from Arna.
With extreme disappointment I have to tell you all that this is the
ruling. The magistrate was incapable of putting his mind to how
a wild animal such as an elephant could be psychologically
distressed.
Sounds absurd? Not only might you think so but also all of the
TV media who were at the court - so much so that their
producers told them not to run it, so that when the the circus
people walked out of the court they found the television crews
packing up and walking away.
WHAT THIS CASE HAS ACHIEVED FOR ARNA AND THE ANIMAL
CIRCUS CAMPAIGN
Arna now has a friend, a companion elephant named Gigi. This
would never have happened if it wasn't for the unprecedented
publicity this court case has attracted nationally and
internationally and the consequent pressure upon Stardust
Circus and the NSW government.
To pay for the extraordinary and positive publicity in all media
formats that this court case has attracted for the plight of Arna's
solidarity and the question of wild animals in circuses at all,
would far exceed any costs Animal Liberation NSW is paying.
So, having achieved this, it is up and onwards to intensify the
campaign to abolish the use and abuse of exotic animals in
circuses.
See you at the next demonstration and council meetings (to have
local governments stop animal circuses from performing on
council owned and controlled land)!
And thank you to all of our supporters who have contributed so
much to this case and the on going campaign.
Mark Pearson
Executive Director
Animal Liberation NSW
|