Nearly twenty years ago I sat in the offices of
the New Jersey Division of Youth and Family Services interviewing
a perky seven year-old boy. I knew little about his family or its
problems, my task was simply to find out about the animals in their
lives and how they were treated. As a way of focusing our discussion,
I showed him a simple drawing of a common scenario - it depicted
a boy and a dog playing ball inside the house. A broken lamp was
overturned on the floor. I asked him to tell me what would happen
next in this story. He grew still and sullen and shook his head
slowly. 'That's it," he said in a matter-of- fact tone, "they're
all going to die" Although he himself was
not a victim of abuse, a sibling had been the target of physical
assaults by his father, who was reportedly responsible for the
disappearance of several family companion animals.
In another discussion
with a six- year-old girl, the child became agitated at one drawing
of a dog sleeping on the bed. She interpreted a shadow on the drawing
as "poopoo" and was concerned about the consequences of someone
having made a mess. I later learned that her younger brother had
been seriously scalded as punishment for soiling his pants and
that the family dog had frequently been severely beaten for lapses
of house-training. The child-protection workers assigned to the
family had been unaware of the triggers for the abuse of the child,
or of the long history of abuse of the dog. Animals play a central role in the lives of children, both in
fantasy and reality. They are central to their dreams, their fantasies,
their play, and their daily lives. More than three-fourths of American
families with school age children have companion animals. Yet,
for many years, child-protection professionals tended to view the
treatment or mistreatment of animals in families as irrelevant
when trying to recognise or understand patterns of abuse. The special
relationship between children and animals was often completely
ignored.
In recent years it has become widely accepted that the
mistreatment of animals can be an indicator of many other forms
of family violence and ongoing abuse and neglect, including child
abuse, elder abuse, domestic violence and mistreatment of the
disabled. Cruelty to animals can also be a significant indicator
that a child or young adult is at high risk of becoming a perpetrator
of violence in society, perpetuating the cruelties that he or she
has experienced. But we have also realised that the proper experiences
with animals can provide a road back to empathy and compassion,
and can be a powerful force for healing and a way of breaking the
cycle of violence.
Soon after working on these early studies linking child abuse
and animal abuse, I joined the staff of the Humane Society of the
United States (HSUS). I was excited to find that, like myself, several
staff members had been collecting information about case histories
where animal cruelty had coexisted with other forms of violence.
Others had documented many instances of notorious violent offenders
who had early histories of repeated and severe acts of cruelty
to animals. This was a connection that seemed obvious to most people
in animal welfare. In fact, the connections between animal cruelty
and other violent behaviour seemed obvious to most of the general
public. Surprisingly, however, only a handful of professionals
had seriously pursued the issue or had written about it the professional
literature.
It was particularly disturbing that the professionals in the best
position to make use of this information, those in law enforcement
and mental health, seemed to be the least interested in the evidence.
Early in my career with the HSUS, I was asked to respond to the
concern of many of our supporters in local humane societies and
animal care and control agencies that serious animal cruelty cases
were being ignored. All too often serious instances of abuse were
being dismissed by local police because the victim was "only an
animal", or because the maximum penalties for even the most horrendous
abuse were little more than a slap on the wrist. The mental health
community also tended to dismiss such cases with "boys will be
boys". The leading guide to defining abnormal behaviour - the "Diagnostic
and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)" of the American
Psychiatric Association made no mention of animal cruelty as being
symptomatic of any disorder.
In 1986 we prepared an article entitled 'The Tangled Web of Animal
Abuse" for the Humane Society News, highlighting the existing
research showing the interconnections between violence against people
and animals. It was designed to give animal advocates a simple tool
to help persuade local officials to take animal cruelty cases more
seriously. It was enthusiastically received and more than 20,000
reprints were ordered by local humane groups over the next few years.
In 1989, at the request of the International Association of Chiefs
of Police, we prepared an updated version (revised in 2001) for distribution
to tens of thousands of police officials around the globe. The HSUS
also began to offer regular workshops to coordinate the formation
of coalitions against violence that bring together the resources
of professionals in animal protection, veterinary medicine, child
protection, adult protective services, domestic violence prevention,
law-enforcement, mental health and other fields.
Ironically, efforts to build community-wide responses to violence,
including animal cruelty, represent a return to the practices of
the early days of the humane movement. I have had an opportunity
to go through the files of many of America's oldest humane societies,
many dating back to the late 1800's. lam often impressed by the reports
of a typical week in the life of a humane agent of cruelty investigator
of this era. In the course of a few days such an agent might lecture
young boys for throwing stones at a bird, charge a tradesman for
overworking his horse, track down a runaway child, respond to a domestic
argument, capture a stray dog, take food to an ailing elderly person
and track down a deadbeat father who owed child support.
Over the years, society's response to violence became very fragmented,
often being distributed across many different agencies focusing on
a single victim or deed. Child abuse was handled exclusively by Child
Protective Services. Spouse abuse was dealt with by women's shelters,
police or victim advocate groups. Elder abuse was the responsibility
of Adult Protective Services. Juvenile offenders were handled by
a separate juvenile justice system whose records and proceedings
were usually sealed due to the age of the offenders. Perpetrators
with substance abuse histories were handled by one system, those
with recognised mental health problems were often channeled into
another. Fortunately, we seem to be returning to the realisation
that the response to violence must involve many agencies in a community
working together, and that cruelty to animals is a significant part
of the web of violence that must be addressed.
Several factors have produced this change. First, there has been
a steady growth in the scientific reports connecting animal cruelty
to other forms of violence, which Frank Ascione and I compiled in
1998 in Cruelty to Animals and Interpersonal Violence. In
addition, the mental health community has slowly recognised animal
cruelty as a possible symptom of mental disorder. The OSM now classifies
animal cruelty with "violence against others" as a sign of conduct
disorder. Third, the HSUS, through its First Strike Campaign
has actively reached out to law enforcement, mental health and social
service organisations, and other animal protection organisation about
these connections. Legislators and law enforcement agencies have
seen the value of treating animal cruelty as a serious crime, often
offering an opportunity for appropriate intervention at an early
age or early stage in the development of violent patterns.
Those of us who love animals and include them in our families have
always seen animal cruelty as family violence. Greater attention
to the common role of the victimisation of animals in the context
of other family violence is helping many professionals get a better
grasp on the dynamics of abuse and neglect in these households, and
provide responses that recognise the widespread, intergenerational
web of violence that often afflicts these families. This attention
is not limited to America. In May of 2001 we brought a First
Strike presentations to New Zealand under the auspices of Unitec,
the Animal Welfare Institute of New Zealand and the RNZSPCA. We have
held similar meetings in Japan, Brazil, Costa Rica, England and Scotland.
I am encouraged by the rapid growth in concern about animal cruelty,
and efforts to create effective responses.
Empathy and compassion for all living things gives us an incredible
gift, but it can also make those who care about animals even more
vulnerable to the violence inflicted on the animals they care about
by those who lack this gift. By recognising the special role of animals
in the tangled web of family violence, people in many different fields
and many nations will be better equipped to help foster a truly humane
society.
Randall Lockwood efforts as spokesperson for the First Strike campaign
were profiled in an award-winning 1999 British documentary entitled The
Cruelty Connection. His book Cruelty to
Animals and Interpersonal Violence, co-edited with
Dr Frank Ascione, was published in 1998. He is currently completing Veterinary
Forensic Investigation of Animal Cruelty with Dr Leslie Sinclair.
He lives in the suburbs of Washington, DC with his daughter Susan,
his wife Julie, two cats, Simba and Nala, and a newt named Sunset.
download pdf version
also see Abuse of animals may lead to murder |